Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Latest Activity

Profile IconWilliam S and Please... Dee Esssss :-) joined splunkninja
1 hour ago
Amine Recoba is now a member of splunkninja
yesterday
Michael Wilde replied to Nikita's discussion Count failures and success via transaction
"How are these transactions linked together... by a field called "ID"?  If so.. just build them with the field ID, and then use one of the MV commands to extract a field with success or failure in it.   Paste some samples and…"
Friday
Linus Myrefelt updated their profile
May 22
Marie updated their profile
May 21
Marie is now a member of splunkninja
May 21
Profile IconJitter and matthew arguin joined splunkninja
May 18
Profile IconMatthew Carter and Nikita joined splunkninja
May 17
I have a service that drops a stats line every minute on every host on 20+ hosts.  If I use sistats I lose information on the true count of events and things like "top fieldvalue" do not work as expected. I believe that with the correct set of evals I can produce the correct set of summary fields to have si comparable results.

looking at si generated data from sistas fields, I have deduced the following meanings but need further clarification:

psrsvd_ct_FIELDNAME = count
psrsvd_nc_FIELDNAME = Also Count?
psrsvd_sm_FIELDNAME = sum
psrsvd_ss_FIELDNAME = sum of squars
psrsvd_vt_cnt = ?? some kind of variance ??

So is ct = count, what is nc really for, what formula do you use for SS (does it include std-dev or is it a simple sum of squares), and what is vt?

The application dumping the stats is in-house and I can add sum of squares values if needed to be compatible and then aggregate the stats and produce si compatible results.

Since the hosts are behind a load balancer and for these results I do not care about the per host values, just the platform values which is why I am aggregating values in splunk.

Also my analysis seems to indicate that the results from the sistats command do not care which operator you use but all produce the same field set for any fields used in an aggregation operator.  If this is true then than would mean I could later ask for the average of a field when I only initially wanted the sum in the sistats command.

Thanks in advance for the help,
Blaine

Tags: aggregate, aggregation, index, sistats, stats, summary

Views: 25

Reply to This

© 2012   Created by Michael Wilde.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service